Power Sharing
Why sharing power is the very spirit of a democracy
Summary
The chapter opens with two contrasting stories — Belgium, which carefully shared power among its Dutch, French and German-speaking communities, and Sri Lanka, where a majoritarian agenda denied the Tamil minority a fair share, leading to civil war.
From these cases it draws two reasons for power sharing: the prudential reason (it reduces conflict and ensures stability) and the moral reason (power sharing is the very spirit of democracy, since those affected by power should have a say in it).
It then classifies the main forms of power sharing — among different organs of government (horizontal), among different levels (vertical/federal), among social groups, and among political parties, pressure groups and movements.
Key points to remember
- Belgium accommodated its Dutch, French and German-speaking communities through careful constitutional arrangements.
- In the Belgian model, central government has equal Dutch and French ministers, and a community government handles cultural and language affairs.
- Sri Lanka adopted majoritarian policies — Sinhala as sole official language, preference to Buddhism — alienating Tamils and leading to civil war.
- Prudential reason: power sharing reduces conflict between social groups and ensures political stability.
- Moral reason: power sharing is the very spirit of democracy; people have a right to be consulted.
- Horizontal distribution: power shared among legislature, executive and judiciary at the same level, with checks and balances.
- Vertical distribution: power shared among central, state and local governments.
- Power is also shared among social groups (community government) and among parties, pressure groups and movements.
Important questions (board pattern)
- 3 marksDistinguish between the prudential and moral reasons for power sharing.
How to answer: Prudential = reduces conflict and ensures stability (about results); moral = the very spirit of democracy (about principle). One line each plus an example.
- 5 marksHow did Belgium and Sri Lanka deal with their ethnic differences differently? Explain.
How to answer: Contrast Belgium's accommodation (equal ministers, community government) with Sri Lanka's majoritarianism (Sinhala-only, Buddhism preference) and its consequence — civil war.
- 5 marksExplain the different forms of power sharing in modern democracies with an example of each.
How to answer: Horizontal, vertical, social-group and party/pressure-group sharing — one clear example each.
- 1 markWhat is majoritarianism?
How to answer: The belief that the majority community should rule as it wishes, disregarding the wishes and needs of the minority.
- 3 marksWhy is power sharing desirable? Give the two reasons.
How to answer: State the prudential reason and the moral reason briefly with the core idea of each.
Common exam traps
- Don't swap the two cases — Belgium = accommodation, Sri Lanka = majoritarianism.
- Prudential vs moral is a frequent 3-marker — keep the distinction crisp (results vs principle).
- Horizontal = same level (organs); vertical = different levels (centre/state/local) — never reverse them.
- Sri Lanka's Tamils are a minority; do not call them the majority community.
Frequently asked questions
- What are the two main reasons for power sharing?
- The prudential reason — it reduces conflict between social groups and ensures stability — and the moral reason — power sharing is the very spirit of democracy.
- Why is Sri Lanka used as an example in this chapter?
- To show how majoritarianism — making Sinhala the sole official language and favouring the Sinhala community — denied the Tamil minority a fair share of power and led to alienation and civil war.
- What is the difference between horizontal and vertical power sharing?
- Horizontal sharing is among organs of government at the same level (legislature, executive, judiciary); vertical sharing is among different levels (central, state and local governments).
- What is the Belgian model of power sharing?
- An arrangement where the central government has equal numbers of Dutch and French ministers, power is shared between central and state governments, and a separate community government handles cultural, educational and language issues.